View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 20-05-08, 11:01 AM
Marcus26's Avatar
Marcus26 Marcus26 is offline
that grass looks greener
  • Recurve
  • Compound
  • Traditional
Setup
Riser: Hoyt UltraElite Jade
Limbs: XT3000
Sight: SureLoc & 7x Scope
Stabilisers: 34" Doinker Elite
Button: Scott Longhorn IV Red
Bow String: Winners Choice 452x
Arrows: ProTour 470 & 2315's

Compound Script currently under construction
Traditional Script currently under construction
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Join my Fanclub!
Posts: 2,370
Quote:
Originally Posted by niceguy View Post
Decreasing arrow point weight will NOT change the spine of the arrow.

Not so Marcus. Adding weight at the front or back of an arrow changes it's dynamic spine and it will act stiffer or weaker. A longer pile insert also changes the effective shaft length as you say but the weight has a major effect also. I have done this many times and the effect of 20 grains can be significant. I recently brought my daughters arrows into tune with a simple change of pile weight.
Rubbish.
How did you measure the tune of the bow? Or is this more recurve stuff in the wrong section again?

With a recurve you can move the bareshaft location by changing the spoint wieght, but you have not adjusted the spine in doing so.
Dynamic spine doesn't exist. Only actual spine and resonant frequency.

here is a quote from James Park on it
Quote:
An aside:
We don't actually adjust the arrow's spine by changing the point weight. The 'spine' is how much the arrow flexes with a certain span and weight and depends upon the shaft stiffness. Changing the point weight does not change this. What it changes is how fast the arrow flexes (but only by a small amount).
__________________
Urban Archery
Beiter Nocks
Game know game and right now you are looking kinda unfamiliar.
Reply With Quote