View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 25-07-05, 06:07 AM
Armchair Archer's Avatar
Armchair Archer Armchair Archer is offline
In the Blue
  • Recurve
  • Compound
  • Traditional
Setup
Riser:
Limbs: W & W Winact
Sight:
Stabilisers:
Button:
Bow String:
Arrows: XX75's 1916 spine

Compound Script currently under construction
Traditional Script currently under construction
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Back of Beyond
Posts: 213
RE: Units of Measure



Being an engineer, I agree with Barry for the most part.</p>

In the engineering world, I very rarely use imperial measurements these days, although I'm pretty conversant with both and generally ok with converting between the two. Then again, I was trained to use both.</p>

The one thing we need to do is be very careful that we don't end up with the American farcical attempt at conversion to metric (Sorry Clicky and co.), I've seen machines from the US which are supposed to be metric and you find bolts with metric heads and imperial threads, or vice versa !!! Or how about a wire belt at 914mm wide?? (actually 3 feet = 914.4mm)</p>

Like Barry, I think that metric is a lot simpler, although I didn't agree with the poll that we should go metric because we're 'part of Europe', if thats the case, lets scrap the pound (heaven forbid) and start driving on the wrong side of the road (Ditto)</p>

Not sure if the GNAS should convert to metric, I kinda like things as they are (it sets the british way of shooting apart from the rest) and they do have metric rounds, if thats what you want.</p>

On the safety side of things, it shouldn't be too much trouble to quote metric AND imperial measurements. I think it's more a case of the rules haven't been updated as much as they should have.</p>



One more thing, if FITA#uses metric, shouldn't we be shooting ends of 10 arrows ???</p>
__________________
Going For Gold Ain't Enough, Gimme The Six Gold End!!!!!!
Reply With Quote