![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||||
| Quote:
The time doesnt really bother me but while my scoes are 'ok' ish, i dont get many x's. the odd 5 yes but very few are x's so the gap between my score and the top runners is going to get much bigger.
__________________ The name's Vodden but please... call me V Field Archer Wannabe |
| |||||
| But the goalposts for everyone will move as well? In 2 months of competitions, what will the problem be? It will just be another number. |
| |||||
| It's going to impact hugely on the game. If you look at sports enjoying growth and success professionally these are the ones that adjust their rules to create parity. In NFL football they introduced many things to allow the bottom teams to compete with teh top teams and prevent one or two dominating. The result is that heaps of teams could win at the start of the season, unlike the early 90's when you knew it was going to be 1-2 teams likely to win. How does this relate to archery? I have been to a number of shoots where the difference between the GMB and MB level archers was around 10 points. The MB archer comes away pleased because he competed. He can feel like he could compete and run with the GMB. Heck for much of the competition he had a chance and in some cases I have watched the win. They are enthused and enjoyed it. They come back. 10 points in FITA Field is massive. For most shooters that's at least 10 targets worth of mistakes. However that's OK, because at the end of the day everyone is close. Now you increase that margin to 20 points and the MB will feel like he's got along way to go. He will really shoot a clean end so every target he feels like he is blowing opprtunies to catch up. The GMB will shoot more 6's and will shoot 18's while the MB will rarely. If you are going to a shoot and getting blown out each time you won't enjoy it as much as you would if you were close each time. This is the problem with the new rule. It has increased the gap between the great and the good and the average. It's cartering to the great and discarding the average. FITA had finally gotten the FIeld game back to where it use to be before the grey face screw up, now they go and screw it up again.
__________________ Urban Archery Beiter Nocks Game know game and right now you are looking kinda unfamiliar. |
| ||||
| The key point for years in FITA rules was consitency. It meant, make all games having same rules and same scoring, with even same/ similar score. The only exception because of the indispensable need was Indoor, but in any case maximum score for an arrow was, since the beginning of FITA, 10 for target and 5 for field. There was no need at all to go to the 6, as there is no need to go to 12 for target (yes, if you have to do it on target, for consistency reason it should be a 12...). Just simply counting X's also for the tied scores in finals and to access finals was going to solve everything without changing anything. By the way they have done it, it cames to: - The need to change all international parameters on field national teams, field categories( at least in Italy), and total confusion for comparison to the past. - The need to modify all results computer programs in the world - The decrease in medium terms of the numer of compound archers shooting field, for reasons clearly explained by Marcus (recurves are not effected, as of the already larger spread in results) Not solved in any case: the impossibility to safeguard arrows on 60 cm close targets
__________________ Do or don't do, not to try! - Yoda |
| |||||
| You Guys are right, Back in the summer i beat Chris White on the 2nd day of a field shoot 357 to 356, i was so pumped. take that day now he shot a stunning 60 x's i only had 50, so he got me buy 9. So in compound shooting i think it is going to open up the field alot. and the there will be a few people who will become untouchable, Cousins/White/Lunden In recurve i am not so sure, Take Cheshire shoot in October, Naomi and Alan Tied on 674 and where both where very far infornt, take into acount Naomi 48 X's and Alan 38x's the gaps just became bigger. The elimination round at the worlds will now not be so close anyway. and the top shooter will come through more often. Barebow i think it will make no differance. In a year now will remember how it used to be and it will become the norm.
__________________ Dont over think it. And remember perfection can be gained. |
| |||||
| Quote:
As for scoring the X as a 6 - I fail to see the point of changing something that doesn't appear to have a problem.
__________________ Fran |
| ||||
| Quote:
Dave
__________________ Barebow Recurve Shooter |
| |||||
| I have heard from a member of the Field Committee. The change in timing at the peg is official, and will come into force for FITA field on 1st January 2008. Thus, next season there will only be a maximum of three minutes allowed at the peg per detail instead of four. The change in scoring is still under discussion, and because of the many considerations involved it might not happen. Watch, as they say, this space.
__________________ Fran |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GNAS/FITA field courses | phil_r_58 | 3D & Field Archery: Discussion/Q&A | 8 | 06-12-07 12:19 PM |
| Fita field target faces/backing | bkupris | 3D & Field Archery: Discussion/Q&A | 13 | 05-12-07 02:25 PM |
| Two Day FITA Field in ESSEX | tikkabhoona | National & International Tournament Information | 8 | 13-05-07 08:34 PM |
| FITA Field? | Desert Archer | 3D & Field Archery: Discussion/Q&A | 27 | 05-03-07 08:36 PM |
| YAA/NCAS Fita Field Champs | Swaledale | 3D & Field Archery: Discussion/Q&A | 15 | 30-10-06 01:47 AM |