| Very interesting question Woodie and I'm intrigued to know what prompted you to ask it. I'd say without doubt that for recurve, it's the archer with the fewer 10's that is the better shot. On a Fita round at 90m for us mere mortals if you hit the gold you're doing well and it's largely down to luck whether it's a 10 or nine. The same can be said to a slightly lesser degree at 70m and even 50m. The only distance that I can say with certainty that I'm aiming at the 10 (and be dissapointed if I get a 9) is 30m. Therefore the archer with the fewer 10's has been more consistent over the four distances with fewer bad shots.
__________________
A wise man can learn from the biggest fool.
|