Thread: Merlin
View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 22-07-06, 06:05 PM
greydog's Avatar
greydog greydog is offline
In the Gold
  • Recurve
  • Compound
  • Traditional
Setup
Riser:
Limbs: Merlin XS
Sight: Copper John field
Stabilisers: Merlin Triad
Button:
Bow String:
Arrows: Pro Tour, X7's

Setup
Bow:
String & Cables:
Sight:
Stabs:
Scope:
Launcher/Rest:
Arrows:
Release Aid:
Traditional Script currently under construction
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 659

Affiliations & Declarations (Click Here)
Affiliation: GNAS
Club: NewCenturyBowmen
Commercial: Staff Shooter
Commercial Interest: Merlin
GNAS Classification: GMB
IFAA Classification: Unclassified

AIUK Rankings & Live Shoots (Click Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry C
I doubt it would need the inserts with the front brace. Hoyt has a sophisticated stress modelling software. If leaving inserts on really was the #1 solution i hypothisise that a, it would be more common or b, it just plane ugly. I Loved the origional merlin lineup, then thy go and make a bow thats really pretty but ruin it with no cut outs then to top it off take away merlins #1 feature, the awesome grip thats been replaced with a plank of wood. I think they went for sales in america compromising along the way. Surely the Supernova is Merlins best target bow to date.
It doesn't need the aluminium left in the holes, they are just there so the inserts have something to stick to, the weight loss achieved by machining out these extra little bits would be negligable.

The front brace has allowed Merlin to machine the handle area thinner, and go with their own shrewd style metal handle, which is proving very popular. The wooden handles seem popular on those bows bought for hunting as wood has better insulating properties.

The Super Nova does have an outstanding handle, something which many manufacturers are only just starting to rectify with their own bows. Who knows, as the 'X' range evolves, maybe this is something that will be incorporated into the design ?
Reply With Quote