View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 12-09-06, 10:05 AM
Adam's Avatar
Adam Adam is offline
In the Gold
  • Recurve
  • Compound
  • Traditional
Setup
Riser:
Limbs:
Sight:
Stabilisers:
Button:
Bow String:
Arrows:

Setup
Bow: Hoyt UltraElite
String & Cables: Bling Strings
Sight: SureLoc
Stabs:
Scope: Beiter
Launcher/Rest: Spot Hogg Infinity
Arrows: Pro Tours/X7's
Release Aid: Carter Target 4
Traditional Script currently under construction
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 691

Affiliations & Declarations (Click Here)
Affiliation: GNAS
Club: Cleve Archers
Commercial: Staff Shooter
Commercial Interest: Hoyt Staff Shooter
GNAS Classification: GMB
IFAA Classification: Unclassified

AIUK Rankings & Live Shoots (Click Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ben tarrow View Post
I agree. Gents FITA is prefered by archers who just can't shoot 100 yards well.
What a complete load of tosh.

I, and many others on here, can make a damn good job of 100 yds, but still prefer FITA rounds.

Imperial rounds no longer have any relevance to any other tournament format shot anywhere other than in the UK. FITA is a standard recognised worldwide, not just by the narrow sectional interests of GNAS. A FITA round offers more variety, a far more enjoyable shooting format (none of that 3-arrows-and-off nonsense) and is a much more sociable event too. It gives results that can be compared to those shot by anyone else, anywhere else (without recourse to handicap tables), and, to cap it, Fita results can be used by those of us interested in achieving international selection. Now, perhaps you'd like to tell me again that I can't shoot 100yds?

Adam