Thanks everyone, that got you going!
I was after a reaction hence the bull headed post!! And I got one!
Haywain saw straight through it but plenty bit.
A lot of valid points have been raised some of which I had not realized were an issue. The confusion about the different rounds and societies is particularly worrying. None the less it is disappointing how few are willing to explore field if only for the experience. The issue of style superiority, well that is an argument that does not nor ever will hold water. But there are those who will still argue about how their chosen discipline or bow is the best, the original, the most demanding or that another is so much less than theirs. This is divisive and it is probably a contributory factor in why there are so many field societies.
Another is the hunting aspect and whether the use of animal faces is in some way ‘unhealthy’.
Perhaps the next move would be for us to explain why each society exists, the differences and the motivation behind them.
Next!
