| I would guess that teh rpoblem is like that of Longbow classifications, only more so. The levels were determined as percentages of scores submitted to the enquiry team. For recurves and compounds this produced a standard progression that has been remarkably accurate over time (though it is being revisited at present). However, there were so few longbow scores submitted, of such widely variable levels, that there was not enough initially to base classifications on. This has improved as more scores were received. So how many Limited Compound scores have been received? Given that I have only seen one being shot in competition, I dare say very few. Records are nothing to go by, as what you need is a consistent picture, not just the (by definition) freak results!
__________________
If - Kipling
|