![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||||
| Easton know that the largest market for target arrows like the Navigator is Europe. Up untill a couple of weeks ago Lancasters' did not even have them on their web site. Why mess up your best market???
__________________ I am not a grumpy old man, I am a cynical senior citizen |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Quote:
I agree that Europe is the largest market for target archery, however the Navi FMJ's are aimed towards the compound archer and the last I read, whilest 85% of the target market was outside the USA (recurve) only 15% of the compound market was outside the USA. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Further examination of the pattern has also shown: Unlike Axis FMJ's the Navi FMJ pattern does not match around the shaft, where it meets is like two pieces of pattern wallpaper meeting at the wrong place in the pattern. This leaves a distinct line down the whole length of the shaft. As this join line is not parallel to to length of the shaft but runs at an angle down the shaft (like the pattern has not been applied straight) it is difficult to tell if the arrows are actually straight or not, the tight pattern gives the impression that the arrows have a bulge in the middle. I know there is not and they are straight, but a visual inspection is very difficult as you go 'boss eyed' looking at the pattern. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||
| Honestly I couldn't care less about the pattern, just ship the ruddy arrows please Easton!!
__________________ |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Is that true? I know the Axis FMJ was squarely aimed at the compound market, and only appears in Easton's 'hunting' selection charts, but the Navigator FMJs have a much wider range which, while it overlaps the stiffer Axis range, also covers a range of sizes which are not likely to be attractive to most compound archers. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Quote:
In all fairness to them, they investigated and got back to me within a couple of hours with the following: 1. To keep the cost down they believe Easton couldn't QC the finish on all the arrows produced or it would make them much more expensive. 2. They don't think that the arrows supplied to Europe were returns to Easton from US dealers as they do not know of any recall by Easton and don't know where the information on AT came from. 3. They tell me that other arrows have had similar finish issues. My opinion: No reason to doubt what I was told by the dealer (I am not naming them but we have had excellent service from them in the past and therefore would not doubt the word of the person who phoned me) The arrows do not appear to be physically affected by the blemishes in any way and therefore can't see a performance problem. Hopefully Wendy will get to shoot them either tomorrow or Saturday and we can post the comparison against the X10's and the Triples. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Here are a couple of images I have taken of the Navi FMJ's. The blemish appears as extra black on the anodising and usually appears between 1 and 3 random places on a shaft. I have also taken a photo of a group of shafts at the label point which shows how the 'join' in the anodising appears on each shaft when compared to the label. ![]() Blemish ![]() Shafts | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||