![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||||
| this was the criteria i was given, we may have a few lady compounds in wales making or bordering the scores, but no recurves. |
| |||||
| Perhaps it needs clarifying from GNAS towers.
__________________ Advice is like snow -- the softer it falls, the longer it dwells upon, and the deeper in sinks into the mind. ~ Samuel Taylor Coleridge |
| |||||
| yet again i think it goes direct to the countries involved, i know it did for the commonwealth cup trial last yr. dodgy belly fortnight as it turned out |
| |||||
| Quote:
it would be a shame if it was the case. And on the qualifiying side it isn't going to be much of an archery event with England, Australia and India the only ones to qualify.
__________________ Advice is like snow -- the softer it falls, the longer it dwells upon, and the deeper in sinks into the mind. ~ Samuel Taylor Coleridge |
| |||||
| GNAS towers....european nations are dealt with direct. i.e. england , wales, scotland, etc its done by commonwealth committee, in india GNAS have nothing to do with the commonwealth criteria. so thats funding gone up the wall as far as i can see.. i know wales part funded the team last year, the team members paid the rest. bad i know but thats the way it is pete |
| |||||
| Backing away from team funding... I don't have a problem with the amount GNAS charges, but as a GNAS field archer I would like to see a little more time spent on field by GNAS. I appreciate that field archers are in the minority in GNAS, but if they don't get their act together you'll get more people going across to NFAS or EFAA. An example of the problem as I see it is the recent FITA rule changes. It was known in October that the FITA field rules were changing. In January the rules were confirmed. In April GNAS printed an update to the rule book with the old rules printed, not the new ones, despite re-printing the pages that should have been changed. Also the classifications have been changed, which is good, but again the new classifications aren't in the amendments, nor are they available on the GNAS website. They are on the GNAS Field site, but why are they not in the official rule book? Field archers pay our money too! |
| |||||
| [quote=English Bowman;236697, but if they don't get their act together you'll get more people going across to NFAS or EFAA. [/quote] That is exactly what has happened in our club.
__________________ Advice is like snow -- the softer it falls, the longer it dwells upon, and the deeper in sinks into the mind. ~ Samuel Taylor Coleridge |
| |||||
| Quote:
I could be wrong, but I undertsand the various Commonwealth Councils pay all the expenses for sending the Teams - transport, clothing etc so no money is needed from the Govering Bodies for the actual event.
__________________ Its the unknown that makes life so rich. Paul Arden |
| ||||
| Quote:
Alternative viewpoint: "What? Someone else do my job?" Actually I've reduced my workload. I was county chair and club equipment officer too. Th eimportant bit is that Mrs GA doesnt have anything more important to do, so I off load the humdrum stuff onto her ![]()
__________________ bring me my bow of burning gold, bring me my arrows of desire.... |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GNAS Membership Application | Tank | General Archery Discussion & News | 2 | 16-01-08 08:04 AM |
| GNAS Membership | Tank | General Archery Discussion & News | 23 | 20-06-07 05:10 PM |
| GNAS fees | Tony_zelah | General Archery Discussion & News | 5 | 13-05-07 04:20 PM |
| when does GNAS membership year start? | ignoramus | General Archery Discussion & News | 5 | 04-04-07 06:58 PM |
| Membership Fees | secbridarchers | General Archery Discussion & News | 17 | 30-07-05 09:45 AM |