Gnas Classification Tables

[MrM]

Originally Posted by Snarkhunter

Robbo,

I obtained a copy of your Excel tables for GNAS and FITA/metric (for which, many thanks). I was then extending them to include the scores for Gents Under 14 (for my son). I was there for looking through the classification tables from GNAS and a peculiarity struck me:

If I shoot a FITA Gents (3 doz @ 90m and 3 doz @ 70m) the the Bowman classification requires a score of 1065. If, on the other hand, I shoot a GNAS Gents Long Metric (3 doz @ 90m and 3 doz @ 70m) then Bowman classification only requires a score of 490!

This doesn't seem to make sense! Am I missing something here?

Yes, 490 seems reasonable as the first half of a gents FITA (you haven't forgotten that there are another 3-doz at 50m and 3 doz at 30m for the FITA have you?)

[robbo]

Yes, 490 seems reasonable as the first half of a gents FITA (you haven't forgotten that there are another 3-doz at 50m and 3 doz at 30m for the FITA have you?)

I think he had MrM.

Snarkhunter, if you carry on to the right of the FITA column you will see that there are an extra 3doz at 50m and 30m for the FITA round.

[Robin Astra]

Some years ago I made an Excel that showed the GNAS rounds (Imperial & metric) with the scores for each handicap rating. Background colours showed the classification. It was only for gents compound. Sounds very simular to this.
If anyone wants a gents compound version I could try and look it out.

[Snarkhunter]

Doh!

Yup, I had missed it. It was the change to the 80cm face that threw me - I assumed that they were alternatives, not as-well-as's.

Thanks for the clarification.