![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Quote:
|
| ||||
| dont anchor in such a way that the string would be on the right hand side of your nose if you are right handed (left hand side for left handed archer). this is a side anchor which leads to big problems (dont anyone say look at magnus petterson 'cos he is very much the exception). side anchor leads to excessive face string contact and flinching of the head it also means you have got the wrong tab hand jaw line position and alignement will be poor. Work on the principal that there can be no exceptions to this rule. |
| |||||
| i assume when you say right hand side of nose you mean fully past the tip of the nose itself ? or is a reference that puts the string still on the tip of the nose but slightly to the right (or left for a leftie) rather than bang down the middle still incorrect ? slainte : rob
__________________ individually we are one drop - together we are an ocean (ryunosuke satoro) |
| |||||
| Quote:
__________________ Urban Archery Beiter Nocks Game know game and right now you are looking kinda unfamiliar. |
| |||||
| That point you make about the solid jaw contact stopping you from floating the elbow makes a lot of sense to me now its spelt out ![]() |
| |||||
| Quote:
Cheers Dave ![]() |
| |||||
| I've never thought that referencing down the side of the face should be used to create good alignment. Its a cheap fix and alignment can be done without it! I think Marcus has put it best when he describes bringing the drawing shoulder back and round towards the start of the draw |
| |||||
| Alignment Are you saying that alignment is best achieved by having the string drawn to to the nose and then having the platform of the tab under the chin to have everything central? Can you not still have the string touch the nose, come the side of the mouth and have vertical alignment between arrow nock and eye? Your eye is not above your nose unless you're a Cyclops ![]() |
| ||||
| with reference to this whole issue read what I have written here and marcus has written in referenced post. Obviously it will not go down well when I say that what we have written is not opinion it is bio-mechanical fact which gives a style that uses the least resources. Anything else is wrong or if it is more palatable Bio-mechanically less efficent |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| string to nose ? | Zanda | Compound Bow: Discussion/Q&A | 15 | 17-10-06 11:45 PM |