![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||||
| If compared to previous system (which, I know, you can't entirely do but can approximate to) Lvl 1 : Assistant Coach Lvl 2 : Coach Lvl 3 : County Coach Lvl 4 : Senior Coach That about right? |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This looks a good and reasonable structure. What stage are we at now (I seem to remember just Level 1 is in place). And, perhaps more important, are current coaches being assessed against the job descriptions and, if necessary, retrained? Is there anything being done about the "old club coach who has been a coach for years because no one has had the heart to tell him he is not up to it" (no one in mind, but they do exist!)
__________________ If - Kipling | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Great stuff Ian. I'm still wondering why this stuff isn't on the GNAS site in considerable detail ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||
| Current situation is that Level 1 is up and running. Levels 2 and 3 are in development now, and the target is to get Level 2 started next year (2006). There should be an article about the current situation in the next issue of Archery UK. Re : the guy who's been coaching for years... There is already an upgrade path from Assistant Coach to Level 1 The others will be looked at in more detail as and when we progress. Target is for all 5 levels to be in place by 2011/2012. With the advent of the new coaching structure, there is a new renewals procedure. Instead of just showing what you have been doing - beginners, intermediates etc., each coach will have to have done some more work outside - things like attendance at Sportscoach UK modules, attendance at coaching seminars (at county regional and national level). Each activity gets a number of points, and over a three year period, depending on the level of qualification, you have to amass a certain number of points. If the CPD requirements are not met, then coaches are given remediation plans, to get them to up to the level they should be at for their coaching qualification. We are looking to getting rid of the notion that Coaching qualifications are "rubber-stamped". It is acknowledged that not all coaches are good at everything - which is why there is a split between performance and development coaches. Performance coaches will specialise in the development of archers from beginners through to elite. They will not be expected to be able to coach at all levels. Support will be available from the level above (except maybve for level 5 coaches...). On the development side, coaches will be looking at new materials that come out into the public domain, will be working to train coaches etc. It could be that a Coach was a Level 4 development Coach and a Level 3 Performance Coach. As well as the changes to the Coaching Structure, there is a change coming at National Regional and County Level. The National Coaching Committee is still there. beneath that there are 3 National Coaching Organisers (Education, Development, Performance). This structure will be starting up in Regions (if it hasn't already started). Already in Scotland we have the 3 Regional Coaching Organisers in place - how it's going elsewhere, I can't say. The target is to get the same structure down to County level. All of the above is linked to a government initiative for coaching. It means we should get funding in the future for going with this. We are ahead of the game compared to other sports' National Governing Bodies. And not only that but we are producing better material than some of them... |
| ||||
| Quote:
|
| ||||
| Quote:
If you go to the GNAS website, click on Coaching (left hand side), and then click on "information page" (right hand side), the article that's going into Archery UK is second in the list (I think). Seek and ye shall find... :hgrin: Iain. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Quote:
When I read the PDF, I wasn't really sure who the intended audience was, and the introduction on the site didn't make it clear either. I'm not *really* criticising, I think it's all good and great to see such information finally becoming available on public media, I just thought it would be good to have a more general, simplified outline on the site, with deeper detail for those who want to find out more (this is probably more a criticism of an "articles" based website as opposed to a "real" website than anything). Perhaps if the GNAS site had a structured breakdown and FAQ on coaching, it might (a) make the new changes more readable and (b) make it easier for those who might consider becoming coaches to get information on the structure and process. Meddler for web editor I say!! Anyway, I digress... have a good weekend all! ![]() [Best regards, the Unqualified Meddler] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Quote:
17th Sept' I went to a "Roll over" course at Rutland (Greetham Valley Golf Club) 09:30-16:30 Had a good day there & came back home with a lot of paper & a CD in a nice wallet. Yesterday mornings post contained 3 certificates Tutor, Course Manager & Mentor. Where do I go from here? I fill in a "3yr Coaching Diary" & GNAS get a copy of that in order to renew my certificate. What else will they be needing ? Diaries for each "Coaching activity"? All I want to do is to shoot for my own pleasure & run Courses (Beginners), Parties, "Hava-a-Goes" etc. to top up my works pension (Still got 3 1/2 yrs to go yet). My Good Lady also has the same certificates. But she does not wish to go down the same path as I (well, not as far). So, working on the "Points system" will she no longer be a coach if she does not paticipate fully as per "Work spec's"? I'm all for better coaching standards but will this new approach make me a better coach or just another paper pusher? This might come over as me being negtive, Honest, I'm not, Im not too clear as to what happens now. A new "Leaders Course" will be taking place at Rosliston Forestry Centre I'm not sure who will be running it but if you are interested get details from Wayne Chesterman Email rosliston@south-derbys.gov.uk I'm sure that he can "Fill you in"
__________________ I love archery. It is the only time I can pull & score | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||
| OK, please excuse me while I get up on my soap box... This is a big one... Quote:
So, now we have a new system where we are trying to be systematic and accountable about things we are doing. And some people have complained about the new system... Attendance at Regional events shows we are trying to keep up with what's going on in the coaching world. Attendance at National events etc... But also there are points for coaching activities - beginners' courses, workshop days etc. Any working Coach will be doing these things anyway, and if you keep a diary of what you have been doing, it makes it easier to fill in the renewal paperwork when it comes in. Having just been on the end of a new style renewal, the renewals panel went through it and queried one of the activities I had claimed. By going back to my diary, I could give the explanation, and clarify that matter. Quote:
Quote:
The idea is that if Coaches are taking part in Coaching activities, they are being helped along by other Coaches, and getting some new ideas. Or passing on tips and tricks they have learnt in certain areas. How often, in the past, have we had Coaches who have kept information very close to their chests about how they deal with archers? How many Coaches do you know who have not shared their knowledge? A Coaching certificate is like a driving licence - we have reached a standard, but we can always improve. Our working lives are governed by Contuinuous Professional Development. Why should Coaching be different? Quote:
I can also supply a copy of the renewal form to give an idea of how the renewal works. Send me a PM with your e-mail address and I'll get it back to you. One of the big fears that was caused when the new structure was announced was that we wold lose a lot of Coaches, because of the Child Protection requirements, the renewals etc. Statistics show that this has not happened. The system we have had in place until quite recently worked, but it could have been better. As time went by, it didn't work as well. The system we are putting in place is better than the previous system, and we have built in the facility to improve it. The Level 1 syllabus will be reviewed and any changes to it will be published in Jan 2006. Right that's it... I'm down off my soap box... 'til the next time. [Phew] |