|
23-07-06, 10:58 PM
| |||
| |||
| anyone got a map? how did the counties of Norfolk and Cambridge get to be in GNAS "SOUTHERN COUNTIES" region? South of WHAT?       |
|
23-07-06, 11:14 PM
| |||||
| |||||
| The Wash? but then Suffolk does not exist to GNAS |
|
23-07-06, 11:19 PM
| |||||
| |||||
| Daft, isn't it! It reminds me a little of the London Evening Standard, that defined London ******** teams as any team in the top two divisions where people commuted into London from. Now (and this is a personal thought, and does not reflect any official thinking) shouldn't we be revising the regional boundaries to bring them in line with Sport England regions? That way we might be able to build up the sort of relationships we need, and worK at getting funding and recognition for our sport. 
__________________ If - Kipling |
|
24-07-06, 01:59 PM
| |||
| |||
 gnas regions I also notice that Southern Counties region has got about 20 counties within its borders, where as most regions have about 4 counties. Isnt this a little unfair. I wonder what the distribution of archers is between regions |
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
